I'll never forget when my friend Sarah sat me down many years ago to lecture me about my relationships with the opposite sex.
"Do you know how many girlfriends you'd have if you shut your mouth? You're smart, sexy, funny, caring and interesting. You read more than anyone I know and you've traveled all over the world. However, your constant need to entertain yourself is your Achilles' heel. You've got to learn to shut up. Also, it would help if you didn't have such an obvious indifference to whether people liked you or not. Idiot!"
At first, I was shocked by her honesty but then I slowly realized that her points were completely valid. I did need to work on how I related to other people.
That lasted about two days.
Look, I know I can sometimes come off as a sarcastic prick who tends to use humor as a defense mechanism and frequently finds himself lapsing under the Mendoza line into the bush leagues of unintentional rudeness. At the same time, I think I may have some form of Tourette's that has removed the filters between my brain and my mouth.
But it's not that I don't like people. It's just that certain events have made me poignantly aware of how short life is and that I shouldn't waste time with shallow idiots who make the Jonas brothers sound like Truman's counsel of Wise Men.
Is it so wrong that I'd rather be alone than spend time with humorless people lacking in intellect, emotion, empathy or character?
I was thinking about this recently when it suddenly struck me that empirically I am a 41-year-old single father with a 5-year-old daughter.
Holy crap!
I'm an old dude with a kid and a weird sense of humor.
Ok, maybe I'm not old but I'm definitely ringing the buzzer on middle age.
Part of the problem is that in my mind I'm a much younger man. Unfortunately, I'm not. This, in and of itself, wouldn't be a big deal if not for the fact that I would like to get married again and possibly have more kids.
And since there's no way that I'm going to date outside my own age range, I'm thinking that I might have to start displaying a little more maturity than I did in my younger years.
Recent conversations with women are convincing me that this may be much harder than I realized and there remains a fairly decent chance that I will die alone.
Conversation No. 1
Woman: "Do you like to read books?
Me: "Immensely. Why? Are you reading anything interesting these days?"
Woman: "Yes! I just finished Twilight. I loved it!"
Me: "Me too! Didn't you like totally cry when Dumbledore died at the end?"
Postmortem analysis: "As a general rule, I don't date women who read children's books."
Conversation No. 2
Me: "Wow. You sure like flossing your teeth."
Woman: "Yes, I do it after every meal. Don't you floss your teeth?"
Me: "Religiously."
Woman: "Every single day?"
Me: "Nah. Just Christmas and Passover."
Postmortem analysis: "At the time, I just thought it was funny. However, friends tell me I was being glib and dismissive. Does it really matter? Could I ever be with a woman who was so obsessed with flossing that she did it publicly after every single meal? I think not."
Conversation No. 3
Me: "Actually, I always thought WWJD meant 'what would Jesus drive?'"
Woman: "Cute. Well, what kind of car do you think Jesus would drive?"
Me: "I don't think Jesus drives. He just rides in the back of a giant Escalade."
Woman: "Why an Escalade?"
Me: "Because everyone says Jesus is their homeboy and all the homeboys I know drive Escalades."
Woman: "Don't you think Jesus would be more environmentally conscious?"
Me: "When you roll with a large entourage, higher emission standards are generally subordinate to the need for third-row seating."
Woman: "Jesus rolls with an entourage?"
Me: "Yeah, those 12 guys following him who keep asking him to turn water into wine."
Woman: "You're not a religious or spiritual man, are you?"
Postmortem analysis: "I know. It's hard to believe I'm 41, isn't it?"
It's interesting being single at the age of 41.
When I was younger, I dated vastly different kinds of women because I wanted to expose myself to a diaspora of individual personalities. Now that I'm older, I tend to find myself far more selective. Or maybe the proper word is discerning.
Nick Hornby once said that it was no good pretending any relationship has a future if your record collections disagree violently or if your favorite films wouldn't even speak to each other if they met at a party.
A small part of me tends to agree with this sentiment. Especially at my age, the idea of being in a relationship with someone who shares my interests and similar perspective on life is warmly comforting. I tend to be very passionate about the things I love so there's a large part of me that wants to be with a woman whom when I read a great book, hear an amazing song, watch a deeply moving film or discover a new restaurant, I can run up to her excitedly and yell, "Look what I found! This is US!"
On the other hand, doesn't every couple start off by talking about all the things they have in common? And if the relationship doesn't last, don't you just end up thinking about all the ways you were so different? More importantly, isn't life much more interesting being with someone who not only has different interests but also brings a different perspective to life?
Does anyone have the answers to these questions?
When it comes to the subject of compatibility, I confess to being as confused as I have ever been. We get together with people because they're the same or because they're different, and in the end we break up with them for exactly the same reasons.
Now granted, there are many other aspects besides compatibility that are important to any healthy relationship. However, when you're single and thinking about whom you'd like to date, compatibility tends to take on a heavier weight.
Honestly, I don't know what the future brings for me and I'll confess that there are times when this uncertainty makes me a tad nervous. I've always been fairly good at meeting women. At the same time, I've always been fairly good at being alone.
Maybe a little too good.
While I am an avowed romantic who firmly believes that no man is an island, I also find myself thinking more and more at this age that perhaps the ideal goal of a relationship between two people isn't a merging of two individuals. On the contrary, maybe the healthiest long-term relationships accept that, even between the closest people, infinite distances exist and the key to happiness is to not only wholly love someone but also to be comfortable with the great expanse that inherently lies between you.
Then again, as another female friend tells me, maybe I just think too damn much.
What say you, my friends?
Only you could write a post about dating and drop a reference to Truman's counsel of Wife Men. Have you ever read Walter Isaacson's book about them? Fascinating read. I think you'd like it.
Posted by: ND | January 15, 2010 at 09:43 AM
So, what I'm hearing is that you want a woman who's smart but easily entertained, who can see that you don't, in fact, have a weird sense of humour, who has a healthy and intellectual taste in music, art, and film but isn't trying hard to be pretentious about it unless the occasion calls for it... and you really don't want to be that Greek dude who had a flower named after him after he died by a pond.
There's no such thing as a relationship advice. Only people who project their own romantic successes and follies onto your situation.
My 2 cents, therefore, will have to be: Don't ever settle. It's better to be lonely alone than be miserable with a moron.
Posted by: Mama Nabi | January 15, 2010 at 10:04 AM
As I've gotten older, I've gotten used to the fact that I'm not going to share everything with my mate. But we agree on the big things: parenting, money, in-laws, religion and we get each other's sense of humor. She likes John Denver. In my younger days that would have been a dealbreaker. I love Superchunk. She, to say the least does not. But that seems to matter less as I am more comfortable in the fact that I don't need anyone else at all to like Superchunk. I like them for me. Same goes for a lot of the other stuff.
You'll figure it out.
Posted by: Josh | January 15, 2010 at 10:43 AM
I am married with children. I have been with many women before my marriage. Having said that I know almost nothing. There are no rules, no road less traveled book laying it all out as guide book. For any individual that individual is on thier own road. I have tried to fit many women and people into my life and sometimes in the end there are no values shared. It can't work. Whether you share intellectualism or great vapid sex. It really boils down to values. I love time alone. It's not easy to find in a marriage but if a woman values that you will fiind a way to make it work.
Dr. Evil said: "Mini-me, you complete me."
It would take a clone to be completed by another individual. We are alone but can share ourselves with another if we work at it and share values and compromise.
Other than that I know nothing.
Posted by: James | January 15, 2010 at 10:47 AM
I am always struck when I read a post and the comments that go along with them by how cool it is we are all so different. If we were all the same, life would be so dull. Like our choice of words, we have so many amazing choices in life. Your description of who you are makes you sound interesting, observational, loyal and funny. I know a lot of women that would find that quite fetching.
Posted by: Carla | January 15, 2010 at 10:56 AM
1) Glad to see you back
2) No answers...Christ, how I wish I DID have answers to some of these questions...
3) Have been in relatively successful relationship for 12 years (with periods of difficulty, granted)...our record collections AND film collections would HATE one another at a party...however, in these past 12 years, I have grown to love foods that I never thought I'd try, travel to places I never thought I'd see and gain insight into issues and politics that I couldn't imagine previously caring about. Relationships are funny that way....life is funny that way.
4) A question I've often asked myself...in those difficult periods...am I still happier WITH him than I'd be WITHOUT him...So far, the answer has dictated that I stay...although this MIGHT change at some point. It's a benchmark I've used for most of my relationships...and so far, it's served me quite well.
Posted by: wn | January 15, 2010 at 11:09 AM
Personally, I think life if way more fun when you're facetious. As I age I'm trying to hold back less, not more. There are plenty of moments when you just have to deal with bad things happening... why muddle up the good times with being too serious?
I hope, since it's in New York this year, that you'll be coming to BlogHer. Just think... all those chicks and at least half of them are smartasses!
Posted by: the weirdgirl | January 15, 2010 at 11:29 AM
You may be discerning and selective but I get the feeling you won't be single for very long.
Don't listen to your friend Sarah. Sure, you're a great-looking guy but your wit, charm and intelligence are what make you even sexier.
Posted by: Kristin | January 15, 2010 at 12:04 PM
I met my current girlfriend a year before we started dating. We are both bloggers and she discovered my blog. She is/was a very good writer and I after reading her entries, I found her to be a bit immature and naive, but also very sharp and sometimes witty.
I'm from Brooklyn and she's from Boston. We were nothing alike. We became friends online and eventually talked on the phone about various things. Actually, she used to only call me when she needed to talk about something--usually about her relationships. The more I got to know her, the more I thought she was definitely not my type. Besides loving to read and write, we have nothing in common. I liked to free-write, going onto a long soliloquy while she preferred to write, edit, write, edit some more and then post her entries.
We both love Malcolm Gladwell, but we like him for different reasons. Aside from Gladwell, Jane Austen would sadly be the only other author we both liked. Both of us have read immensely, but I think to date, we only like about 5 of the same books.
While we both listen to music, she is more about classical piano and Chopin, while I am a huge Aerosmith and Guns N Roses fan.
And then after lots of alcohol one night, we hooked up and then decided to give a relationship a try. For the past, 9 months, we have argued about 10 times and not ONE time had anything to do with our relationship. We would fight about how to understand music, whether the first day of the week is Sunday or Monday, copyright laws, etc.
As you can see, we're extremely different and we are both very strong personalities. We both believe we are right about everything. And yet, we are compatible. I love her and I can't imagine spending my life with someone else. I mean, she supports the RED SOX! Being a Yankees fan, I am literally sleeping with the enemy, but you know what? Life has been great despite our many disputes. What we both agree on is that our differences make our relationship interesting.
Those are my thoughts and I hope that it can provide you some insight. Honestly, I'm young and I probably can't tell you anything you didn't already know. I think in finding love, you just have to always be yourself. The hardest thing is not finding someone to love, but to find someone who feels the same way about you.
Goodluck MD.
Brooklyn Boy
Posted by: Brooklyn Boy | January 15, 2010 at 12:14 PM
Yeah, you think too damn much.
That said, I think (speaking as a mid-30s Asian woman who has been married for 5 years) that marriage is less about compatibility than about willingness to compromise by both parties, equally. All that other stuff, compatibility and acceptance of each others' quirks, kind of fall by the wayside after a while.
Posted by: june | January 15, 2010 at 12:39 PM
Sometimes when you write I think we must have been separated at birth because we see the world so similarly. This is one of those times. As an even older single mother, well beyond my mid-life crisis, I do like being alone much of the time, and I do think about what I'd do if a relationship came about. I don't know because I don't look. I gave up after I realized I was smarter, funnier, and more independent than the men I met. They talked sports, I talked Robertson Davies. They talked sports, I talked about ad hoc and the French Laundry. They talked sports and I talked about whether or not Hamlet was a weenie or just young and immature. And worst of all, they didn't get my biting sarcasm and thought I was mean. Harumph.
I think when you're smarter and funnier than most, you do end up spending more than enough time alone. Very few people love a sarcastic smartass, especially one that has real intellect behind them. I am continually astounded by how people think it's OK to stop learning, because I can't imagine a time when I don't want to challenge myself intellectually.
Last book read: Two Lives by Vikram Seth.
Currently reading: The Given Day by Dennis Lehane.
Next book up: Half of a Yellow Sun by Chim Amanda Mgozi Adichie
Keep your chin up, Pierre. You're such a valuable and interesting person. Someone will come along. It might be a chubby 57 year old single mom from the north. It might be someone else. :-)
Posted by: margalit | January 15, 2010 at 01:16 PM
My husband is a naturally thin German dude who smokes, drinks, loves Rock and Roll, hates hip-hop and/or electronic music of any kind, prefers "thinky" movies (international, arthouse and the like), is perpetually tidy, tight-fisted, a linguist by training, a meat-und-kartoffeln-eater and is kind and patient, sometimes to a fault.
I am a naturally fat Texas girl who hates smoking, no longer drinks, a runner who digs running to electronica and hip-hop, *hates* pretentious "thinky" arthouse cinema crap, is perpetually messy, a spendthrift, a programmer by training, mostly vegetarian, and impatient to the point of major fault.
So what do we have in common? We both hate Rush. And we love each other ridiculously, and love to tell each other so.
What I love about him is that I am always confused by his behavior-- I don't get him, at least not immediately, and I love that-- keeps me on my toes. He's really funny and smart and he's really great to me. What I hate about him is that I am always confused by his behavior. I hate that I don't always understand why he does the things that he does, or that he isn't always instantly on board with whatever great new scheme I have in my head. It's frustrating for someone as impatient as me.
I have dated those who are *vastly* different from me, whose values are so at odds with mine (discovered after two months that I had been dating a Republican-- how the hell did that happen?) that it could never work. And I have dated those much more similar to me, and we inevitably drove each other crazy (the indecisive among us know the awful debate that happens when you and your partner share that trait-- "Where do you want to eat?" "I don't know. Where do YOU want to eat?" "I don't know. I want to eat wherever YOU want to eat." "Well, I don't know. What sounds good to you?" "I don't know...", etc., etc., ad nauseum).
So where does that leave a person? I guess my advice is to find a person whose differences are intriguing to you, or whose differences lie in areas that are not as important to you. I love music, was a music major for three years, have love for most every type of music on the planet, but it's not important to me that my partner share my specific interests. It would bother me if he didn't like music at all, but that he prefers the Rolling Stones whereas I could take or leave them isn't really important (that we both hate Rush *is* important, though, because we are virtually alone in that conclusion. It's unifying in the face of our many Rush Fan friends.). And since I like to cook and he likes to eat, it doesn't bother him that I don't often cook the heavier food that he likes because I just make lighter food taste good, period.
So yeah. Choose your lines that must not be crossed (if an addiction to crappy teen vampire literature is among them, so be it), but also consider a little flexibility (Twilight is so horrible, but is embarrassingly addictive that even total book snobs have succumbed to it's siren song). And just generally give people a chance. If you can find something attractive about them, and the unattractive points are slim, then it might be worth a shot.
Posted by: Kate (Bee In The Bonnet) | January 15, 2010 at 01:33 PM
Well, I have found that the less you say, the smarter people think you are. (and better conversationalist - since it lets the other person do all the talking, which most people love!)
That said, I don't see you holding your tongue too much. Better to be without a partner than with one who doesn't get you, I think. (easy for me to say, right?)
Posted by: nonlineargirl | January 15, 2010 at 01:50 PM
Be yourself. So silly, but true. You can't keep up a facade but also aren't being true to yourself until you can truly be yourself. Those conversations you had, to me, are all hilarious. Especially the third one. If I had a discussion like that before I was married, I totally would have been intrigued.
That just means you haven't found the right woman yet. Don't sell yourself short because you think you shouldn't be single. That will make NO ONE happy.
Good luck. And remember, love yourself first.
Posted by: Mrs Soup | January 15, 2010 at 01:58 PM
As you said, there are many other aspects besides compatibility that are important to any healthy relationship.
But I found this the most interesting part of your post:
"maybe the healthiest long-term relationships accept that, even between the closest people, infinite distances exist and the key to happiness is to not only wholly love someone but also to be comfortable with the great expanse that inherently lies between you."
My husband and I are very independent people who lead very independent lives. We're very similar in that regard. From the outside, it may seem that we're unhappy with one another and are seeking comfort from outside interests.
Nothing could be further from the truth. We love each other dearly but both know that in order to be healthy together, we need to be healthy alone.
It took me a long time to understand this by about myself. It took me even longer to find someone who felt the same way.
Posted by: Angelica S. | January 15, 2010 at 02:16 PM
I read you in part BECAUSE of that precise sense of humor and intelligence. Pretend to be something you are not to get into a relationship? Then won't you be somewhere you are just dying to get out of every minute?
You need to find someone who will love the sense of humor you have and has enough backbone and independence to value your critical thinking ability but not be crushed or offended when it clashes with her opinions.
I think it definitely helps to have one or two of the things you LOVE in life also in common with the person you love. But other things are things we allow space in a relationship for because we love our partner and that's enough.
Posted by: Jen | January 15, 2010 at 02:42 PM
I don't know who these humorless women you're meeting are, but I found all of the conversations listed quite funny. Of course I'm an almost 40yo woman who tends to offend my late 30-early 40 year old girlfriends with my biting sense of humor on a regular basis. So yeah, now that I think about it, you're probably screwed. I'd go with Derek's comment, "Stop thinking so much and go find yourself a hot Swedish model. Trust me. You'll be compatible."
Posted by: Kellyology | January 15, 2010 at 02:46 PM
Those conversations are hilarious. Unfortunately, I'm not available and neither of us is gay.
Posted by: Papa Bradstein | January 15, 2010 at 02:59 PM
pants on the ground, pants on the ground, lookin' like a fool with your pants on the ground...
welcome back. glad you are out there lookin' and happy new year.
Posted by: Michelle Lee | January 15, 2010 at 03:20 PM
See, I was all itchy to comment, then I read the second-from-last paragraph. The whole merging of souls thing is an amazingly appealling idea, but I personally think that it's not the best basis for a long term relationship. Unless you luck out and both evolve and develop yourselves in very similar ways, you'll end up feeling separated and distant as you grow as individuals, because you won't be in that totally synchronous space any more.
Figuring out what your 'essentials' are and making sure they're compatible seems to be the only approach to me, though it's infinitely easier to say that than it is to find it.
Posted by: Alice | January 15, 2010 at 03:28 PM
Like the old saying goes---"Opinions are like assholes. Everybody's got one."
It's interesting reading people's comments here. Especially from the young ones who haven't experienced the joys or pressures of marriage and parenthood.
We all value unique things from a relationships and place them in different pecking orders in a way that we think suits us. In the end, we're never really sure about any of it. Sometimes it works. Sometimes it doesn't.
But whether you're single or in a relationship, the most important thing is that you just gotta keep trying.
Nobody ever truly figures it out completely.
Posted by: LME | January 15, 2010 at 03:33 PM
The whole point about dating is to learn about each other. There's no point to hold yourself back. Just be yourself
Posted by: Kal | January 15, 2010 at 03:35 PM
The last paragraph of your post was so insightful. I think its something my husband and I have just figured out after 4 years of marriage (starting at the age of 41 I might add and following 10 years of being single prior to that for both of us). We have our similarities and things we love together but its in understanding and appreciating our differences that we have truly learned to appreciate and love who we truly are as individuals and not just what we thought we wanted in a partner. Its in filling the in between with love and letting the individual flourish that the couple has grown stronger.
Posted by: Chris | January 15, 2010 at 03:48 PM
You're fucking hilarious. Nice to have you back. Write more please!!!
Posted by: Brent | January 15, 2010 at 06:02 PM
MD,
Happy to hear your voice. Life is short, and no point in wasting your time on people who can't make you laugh as much as you entertain people like me. Did we take sarcasm at HM, or were we just born to it?
Posted by: alice, uptown | January 15, 2010 at 07:13 PM
Pfft, theories shmeories...
My opinion is that you can rationalize everything and construct your theories (which may be pretty accurate) but at the end of the day, when you meet someone you connect with, all of it goes flying out the window.
Your friend is right, you definitely think too much. Meet people, enjoy yourself and when you meet someone special, trust me, you will know it.
Posted by: charity | January 15, 2010 at 07:39 PM
Oh Metrodad... it's good to have you back.
Posted by: Stella | January 15, 2010 at 08:31 PM
If you're asking if you think too much, you've posed a rhetorical question.
Posted by: papa2hapa | January 15, 2010 at 10:31 PM
Glad to see you're back! Happy New Year to MD and Peanut! May this year bring promise, health and hope!
About the age thing, DH is younger than me slightly. He says women might as well go out with younger men because they never grow up anyways... Good luck in the romance department, if that's what you're focusing on these days.
Posted by: Amy | January 15, 2010 at 10:54 PM
If you have to think so much, you are either not ready or have not met the right one. Just be yourself.
Posted by: Zann | January 15, 2010 at 11:32 PM
I say just be yourself, humor and all. The right person will appreciate you for who you are. And don't try to hard at looking for that person. It usually just happens when one isn't looking.
Sorry about the divorce. Was shocked by your news. I haven't been by here in a long time for the same reason--I'm also going through a divorce. Am now getting back into blogging and catching up.
Posted by: Kila | January 15, 2010 at 11:56 PM
Keep the faith... some one will get it eventually. You're probably right to avoid the Twilight mommies, though. Yikes.
Posted by: Naomi | January 16, 2010 at 12:01 AM
Fuck it dude, let's go bowling.
Sometimes you just need to, unfortunately, go bowling. Too much self introspection = mental-masturbation.
You're single, straight, and a dad. Which is the most important..? 2nd? and then 3rd?
I spent, as a single straight, fit (although anti-social and mildly OCD) relatively attractive guy (girls always told me I looked like Christian Slater from 'Pump Up The Volume'), lots of time alone. I slept with a lot of girls, but I was still almost totally alone.
My wife was the accident I didn't mean to do. She was my boss's sister, which was awkward, didn't take any shit, which I was full of, and I didn't like her family (which is important to me, as I have nobody else). We've been togeher 10.5yrs and together for 13.75.
Love is the traffic accident you didn't see coming. The one person, however grating, you can't exorcise from your brain. Love ain't perfect, that's for sure, but for all it's pain, you can't beat it.
As for the 'Twiilight mommies' better to set your own boat on fire and push it out into the fjord... die like a man, bro.
Posted by: teufelkindsvater | January 16, 2010 at 12:38 AM
sorry for the editing errors... too much wine.
married for 10.5 and together for 13.75
Posted by: teufelkindsvater | January 16, 2010 at 12:41 AM
What says me is that thousands of women all over the world just read those three conversations and were instantly smitten.
Great to see you here again, Pierre.
Posted by: Asha Dornfest | January 16, 2010 at 12:50 AM
'....infinite distances exist and the key to happiness is ... to be comfortable with the great expanse that inherently lies between yo
that to me is a very perceptive observation and the hardest to do ..with a couple of riders! a. Both parties involved have to realize this and b. both have to not just acknowledge the difference but also appreciate it..
and bring in a lot of fun to marriage..be able to laugh about things together!
Posted by: usha | January 16, 2010 at 01:48 AM
Don't lose the sense of humor and don't change for a woman/relationship. You remind me a lot of my husband and we work wonderfully well together. We both have a twisted sense of humor and it makes for great laughter and outlooks on life. Who else could you travel cross country with and make fun of people with while bantering back and forth? It makes for a good life and you'll find someone that you fit with. But stick to your ideals. You read and quote many of the same authors that my husband does. While I read some of the same, I also have read tons of books he would never read and I'm not talking about Twilight-vomit! But if we weren't a little different we would hate each other. We both enjoy our time alone and he too confesses that he's great by himself. It's important to carve that out in any relationship. Hang in there, you're doing a great job. In the mean time, post more. You make me laugh!
Posted by: Holly | January 16, 2010 at 12:05 PM
I'm reading this book for Christians (I know you aren't religious) "I Kissed Dating Goodbye." It tells us to embrace and enjoy your "singleness," because once you're in a relationship/marriage you'll be wondering where all your time went and why you didn't take that time to put it to good use. Enjoy the time that you have now, especially with Peanut.
Posted by: Leanne K | January 16, 2010 at 12:15 PM
Quite profound for an "immature" 41 year old! No man is an island, but he could be a peninsula.
The thing about your blog is that, I never know what I am going to get. I come here for a good laugh and then you make me think.
Get back to the mundane, will ya!
But while we are on the subj, my formula is - are the silences comfortable, is the chemistry still alive, can you enjoy a silly movie together, and can you still respect the differences? The last one is a little tough, but we get by.
Posted by: munimma | January 16, 2010 at 03:14 PM
When my hubby and I got married 16 years ago we included a quote that I think is from Rilke about being the guardian to another person's solitude. That kinda says it all for me.
I've never thought two people merge into one, or that that could in any way make a good union. A union is merely that, a merging of two unique forces. It is trust, or the ability to grow into trust, that makes for a good relationship.
That said, I think reading Harville Hendrix's book "Getting the Love you Want" is right about up your alley right now.
Posted by: rebecca | January 16, 2010 at 04:31 PM
I stopped at "public flossing."
Seriously?
We all know the only acceptable public flossing is of the ass persuasion.
Where you finding these girls, MD? Staten Island?
Posted by: Motherhood Uncensored | January 16, 2010 at 08:31 PM
Glad you're back--lots of pent-up MD love I'm reading. But you're killin' me. You cannot filter your heart. People talk about magnetism and chemistry because love is irrational, as several posters here have detailed in their own personal experiences. You'll know, when you can't wait for Peanut to meet her. But be prepared for a few thumbs-down.
So yeah, you think too much.
Posted by: R2 Dad | January 16, 2010 at 09:42 PM
Is it possible to fall in love with someone just from their blog post?
Because. Because I just did.
Posted by: Ms.V | January 16, 2010 at 10:03 PM
Man, I've missed you. Welcome back.
Posted by: Petunia | January 16, 2010 at 10:12 PM
Been a long-time reader here for many years and I just wanted to say that I've always been impressed by how you think about things.
I've learned a lot and gained a lot of perspective from reading your blog. Thanks for your writing. You're a special guy.
Posted by: Katie D. | January 16, 2010 at 10:17 PM
How about an older woman, with adult sons and grandchildren the same age as The Peanut.
Glad to have you back, I have missed you.
Posted by: Grandmother | January 17, 2010 at 12:44 AM
i would recommend a book, "Being in love" by Osho. Its quite a good book for a lonely heart. Dont worry, its not some chick flick or a kids book. A light philosophy book.
Posted by: tiarajoe | January 17, 2010 at 04:58 AM
You should send in an application to Millionaire Matchmaker for fun. I don't think Patti's featured an Asian man on the show yet. A BIG guilty pleasure of mine. Most of the first dates are painful to watch but Patti has some gems/pearls of wisdom once in a while like "Morals and values are dealbreakers but habits are not." in response to a woman who said she can't date men who drink out of a straw. Does this mean I have to accept guys who don't know the difference between their/there/they're?
Posted by: Haley | January 17, 2010 at 09:36 AM
Glad to see you back MD! Single or not, it's your choice. Have fun and take care of Peanut! BTW Sarcastic witty humor is always a good front in those circumstances! Cheers!
Peas Out!
~daddy b.
Posted by: daddybookins | January 17, 2010 at 09:56 AM
I say call "conversation #3" and ask her out again. She sounds like a good match.
Posted by: Rosie | January 17, 2010 at 11:56 AM